Can we trust the “findings” and the proclamations of the
scientific community? Not if it is dominated by fear and repression! Here is a
good example of what happened to a scientist who published findings that didn’t
agree with the party line:
- Soft unfossilized tissue continues to be found in a wide variety of fossilized dinosaur remains. One of the latest is a stretchy film membrane containing unfossilized osteocytes (bone cells) found inside a triceratops horn in 2012. The paper reporting this find was published in a peer reviewed journal called Science Direct, Volume 115, Issue 6, July 2013, pages 603-608. These unfossilized tissues are made of fragile protein molecules which under the best conditions…have total degeneration projected at less than 30,000 years. (Bruce Malone, Search for the Truth, Vol.6, Number 4, Fall 2013)
Of course, such a finding calls into question the orthodoxy
of the evolutionary establishment, requiring a re-dating of both the dinosaur
and the rock level – millions of years old, according to this orthodoxy.
We might hope that the establishment would welcome these multiple
finds, however unorthodox they might be, and re-adjust their theory accordingly.
Instead,
- [Mark] Armitage [California State University] was fired from his job within days of his paper being published…This was in spite of years of stellar performance and excellent reviews setting up and running the university’s microscopy lab.
How then can a rational person trust the establishment’s
pro-evolution pronouncements? On the one hand, these elites control hiring and firing
to such an extent that only their (unnaturally) selected few can make authoritative
pronouncements. On the other, they receive all of the research money. Result –
scientific monopolies might produce convincing propaganda, but they don’t make
for good and trustworthy science.
No comments:
Post a Comment